+7 (495) 957-77-43
Контакты

T-Comm_Article 8_12_2021

Извините, этот техт доступен только в “Американский Английский”. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.

RISK FACTORS ANALYSIS OF DISTRACTION ACTIONS FROM DRIVING

Maria Yu. Karelina, Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University, Moscow, Russia, karelina@madi.ru
Pavel I. Pospelov, Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University, Moscow, Russia, pospelov@madi.ru
Alexander G. Tatashev, Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University, Moscow, Russia, a-tatashev@yandex.ru
Alexey V. Terentyev, Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University, Moscow, Russia
Yuri V. Trofimenko, Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University, Moscow, Russia, ecology@madi.ru
Marina V. Yashina, Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University, Moscow, Russia, yash-marina@yandex.ru

Abstract
The issues related to the study of risk factors that are associated with the commission of non-driving actions by drivers, which are factors that increase the likelihood of a road traffic accident, are considered. Studies on the frequency of activities secondary to driving, associated risks and factors influencing the frequency of different types of such activities have been carried out in various countries. One of the most common traffic violations committed by drivers is using a smartphone while driving. The studies were carried out in the following ways: by interviewing, by observing the driver with a video camera installed inside the vehicle he is driving, and by observing passing vehicles from the outside. In this paper, we propose an approach using the methods of mathematical statistics to assess the correlation between side effects that distract from driving and factors that affect the frequency of such actions.

Keywords: traffic models, road safety, risk factors, correlation, factor statistical analysis

References

  1. Haüfikeit von Anblenkung bei Autofahren Berichte der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen. Mensch und Sicherkeit, 2020, Heft M 297.
  2. M. Vollrath, J.F. Krems (2011). Verkehrpsychologie: Ein Lehrbuch für Psychologen, Ingenieure und Informatiker. Kohlhammer Verlag.
  3. A. Huemer, M. Vollrath (2012). Ablenkung durch fahrfremde Tätigkeit — Machbarkeitsstudie. Berichte der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen. Mensch und Sicherkeit M225. Bremerhaven: Wierschaftsverlag NW.
  4. J.F. Kubitzki, T. Vagner, V. Evert, R. Chaloupka-Risser (2018). Ablenkung und Straßenverkehr. Die Wegwendung der Straßenverkehr. Die Wegwendung der Straßenverkehrteilnehmer vor ihre Aufgabe, sich regelkonform und sicher auf öffentlichen Wegen zu verhalten, ihre Ursachen, Gefahren und mögliche Maßnahmen. INFOS-POSITIONEN \ _EMPFEUNGEN Berlin Deutshe Gesellschaft für Verkehrpsychologie e. V.
  5. S.J. Klauer, T.A. Dingus, V.L. Neale, J.D. Sudweeks, D.J. Ramsey (2006). The impact of driver inatention on near crash/crash risk. An analysis using the 100-car naturalistic driving study data. Virginia Tech Transportation Institute.
  6. R. Evenink, Y. Barnard, N. Baumann, X. Augros, F. Utesch (2014). UDRIVE: the European naturalistic driving study. In Proceedings of Transport Research Arena. IFSTTAR.
  7. A.V. Terentyev (2015). Multi-criteria indicator of the quality of the car. Bulletin of civil engineers. St. Petersburg: SPbG ASU. 1 (48).
    P. 2001-2004.
  8. M.Yu. Karelina, I.V. Arifullin, A.V. Terentyev (2018). Analytical determination of weight coefficients in multi-criteria assessment of the efficiency of vehicles. Bulletin of the Moscow Automobile and Road Technical University (MADI), vol. 52, no. 1. P. 3-9.
  9. Yu.V. Trofimenko (2009). Assessment of the harm caused to the environment by the regional motor transport complex. Bulletin of the Moscow Automobile and Road Technical Institute (State Technical University), vol. 17, no. 2. P. 97-103.
  10. Trofimenko Yu.V., A.N. Yakubovich (2017). Risks of natural disasters on a promising network of high-speed highways in Russia. Science and technology of the road industry, vol. 79, No. 1. P. 38-43.
  11. Yu.Trofimenko, Komkov V., K. Trofimenko (2020). Forecast of energy consumption and greenhouse gase emissions. Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 50, pp. 698-707. Doi: 101016 /j.trpro.2020.10.082
  12. Yu.V. Trofimenko, T.Yu. Grigorieva, E.V. Shashina (2010). Transport system and driver reliability. Motor transport enterprise, no. 10. P. 16-19.
  13. Yu.V. Trofimenko (2010). Ways to improve the environmental and road safety of the motor transport complex in Russia. News of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 12, no. 1-9. P. 2345-2349.
  14. Yu.V. Trofimenko, T.Yu. Grigorieva, E.V.Shashina (2012). Measures to reduce driver fatigue and stress when performing intercity and international transport. Avtotransportnoe predpriyatie, no. 5. P. 9-11.
  15. Yu.V. Trofimenko, A.N. Yakubovich (2015). Methods for predicting the risks of natural emergencies on the road network. Safety in the technosphere. No. 2 (March-April). P. 73-82.
  16. M.V. Yashina, A.G. Tatashev, A.S. Dotkulova (2019). Function of the state of the traffic flow taking into account the influence of the human factor. Information technologies and innovations in transport. Materials of the 5th International Scientific and Practical Conference. Oryol, May 22-23, 2019. Publishing house: Oryol State un-t them. I.S. Turgenev. P. 52-57.
  17. M.V. Yashina, A.G. Tatashev, A.S. Dotkulova, N.P. Susoev (2019). Deterministic-stochastic traffic model with a variation of the psychophysiological properties of drivers. Systems of synchronization, signal generation and processing, no. 6. P. 74-79.
  18. M.V. Yashina, A.G. Tatashev, A.S. Dotkulova, N.P. Susoev (2019). Accounting psycho-physiological types of drivers in the deterministic-stochastic traffic model. 2019 Systems of Signal Synchronization, Generating and Processing in Telecommunications (SYNCHROINFO), pp. 1-4. DOI: 10.1109 / SYNCHROINFO.2019.8814008.
  19. A.S. Dotkulova, M.V. Yashina, Y.V. Trofimenko, A.G. Tatashev (2020). Attention driver evaluation in collective traffic behavior via gaming technology. 2020 International Conference on Engineering Management of Communication and Technology (EMCTECH), pp. 1-6. DOI: 10.1109 / EMCTECH49634.2020.9261531.
  20. P.I. Pospelov, M.A. Belova, A.V. Kostsov, A.G. Tatashev, M.V. Yashina (2019). Technique of traffic flow evolution localization for calibration of deterministic-stochastic segregation model. 2019 Systems of Signals Generating and Processing in the Field of on Board Communications, pp. 1-5. DOI: 10.1109 / SOSG.2019.8706766
  21. P. Pospelov, A. Kostsov, A. Tatashev, M. Yashina (2019). A mathematical model of traffic segregation on multilane road. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 442- 446. doi: 10.21533 / pen.v7i1.384
  22. M.V. Yashina, A.G. Tatashev, P.I. Pospelov, N.P. Susoev (2020). Optimization of regulation parameters for traffic scenario with dedicated public transport lane, 2020 International Conference on Engineering Management of Communication and Technology (EMCTECH), 2020, pp. 1-6. DOI: 10.1109 / EMCTECH49634.2020.9261534.
  23. M.V. Yashina, A.G. Tatashev, P.I. Pospelov, Duc Long., N.P. Susoev (2021). Evaluation methodology of distribution of vehicle lane-change probabilities on multilane road before crossroad. 2021 Systems of Signals Generating and Processing in the Field of on Board Communications, pp. 1-5.
  24. P.I. Pospelov, Le Duc Long, A.G. Tatashev, M.V. Yashina (2021). Methodology of assessing the regulated crossing throughput with a dedicated lane for ground public transport based on a probabilistic model. 2021 IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1159 012084.
  25. P.I. Pospelov, Le D.L. (2021). Organization of traffic at an unregulated intersection with a dedicated lane for ground public transport. Bulletin of the Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University (MADI). No. 2 (65), p. 88-95.
    27. Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt (2015). Bestand an allgemeinen Fahrerlaubnissen im ZFER am 1. Januar 2015 nach Gesehlecht, Lebensalter und Fahrerlaubnisklassen. http: /www.kba.de/DE/statistic/kraftfahrer/ Fahrerlaubnisse/Fahrerlaubnis_bestand / \ _fahrerlaubniski.html? nn = 652036
    28. S.P. Walsh, K.M. White, MCD Young R. (2010). Needing to connect: The effect of self and others on young people’s involvement with their mobile phones. Australian journal of Psychology, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 124-203.
    29. T. Petzoldt, F. Utesch (2016). Trying to validate subjective reports with naturalistic driving – a case against questionnaires and surveys to quantify driving distraction. European Conference on Human Centered Disign for Intelligent Transport Systems, 30 June-1 July 2016, Loughborough UK.
    30. K. Young, M. Regan, M. Hammer (2007). Driver distraction: A review of the literature. Disrtacted driving, pp. 379-405.
    31. M.J. Sullman, F. Prat, D.K. Tasci (2015). A road study of driver distractions. Traffic Injury Prevention, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 552-557. DOI: 10.1080 / 15389588.2014.980319
    32. F. Prat, M.E. Gras, M. Planes, S. Font-Mayolas, M.J. Sullman (2017). Driving distractions an insight gained from roadside interviews on their prevalence and factors associated with driver distraction. Transportation Research. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, vol. 45, pp. 194-207. DOI: 10.1016 / j.trf.2016.12.01
    33. M.J. Sullman. An observational study of driver distraction in England. Transportation Research. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, vol. 45, pp. 194-207. DOI: 10.1016 / j.trf.2012.01.01
    34. J.I. Sabzevari, A.R. Nabipour, N. Khanjani, A.M. Tajkooh, M.J. Sullman. An observational study of secondary task engagiment while driving on urban streets in Iran Safe Communities. Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 96, pp. 56-63. DOI: 10.1016.j.aap.2016.07 / 020
    35. M. Vollrath, A.K. Huemer, C. Teller, A. Likhacheva, J. Fricke (2016). Do German drivers use the smartphones safely? — Not really! Accident Analysis and Prevention, 96, pp. 29-33. DOI: 10.1016 / j.aap.2016.06.003
    36. B. Metz, A. Landau, M. Just. Frequency of secondary tasks in driving-Results from naturalistic driving data. Safety Science, 68, pp. 195-203. DOI: 10.1016 / j.ssci.2014.04.002
    37. C. Corney, K. Harald, D. McGehee. Using event-triggered naturalistic data to examine the prevelance of teen drive distractions in real-end craches. Journal of Safety Research, 57, 47-52. DOI: 10.1016 /j.jsr.2016.03.010
    38. P. Gershon, C. Zhu, S.G. Klauer, T. Dingus, B. Simons-Morton. Teen’s distracted driver behavior. Prevalence and predictors. Journal of Safety Research, 63, pp. 157-161.
    39. K. Lipovac, M. Derić, M. Tešić, Z. Andrić, B. Marić (2017). Mobile phone use while driving-listery review. Transportation Research. Part F. Traffic Psychology and Behavior, 47, pp. 132-142.
    40. T.A. Dingus, F. Guo, S. Lee, J.F. Austin, M. Perez. Buchanan-King M., Hankey J. Driver crash risk factors and prevalence evaluation using and prevalence evaluation using naturalistic ariving data. Proceeding of the Nature Academy of Sciences, 113 (10), pp. 2636-2641. doi: 10.1073 / pnas.1513271113
    41. J. Kubitzki, W. Fastenmeier (2016). Ablenkung durch moderne Informations und Kommunicationtechniken und Soziale bei Autofahrern. Unterföhring: Allianz Deutschland AG.
    42. J. Kubitzki (2011). Ablenkung in Straßenverkehr. Die unterschätate Gefahr. München: Allianz Deutschland AG.
    43. A. Huemer, M. Vollrath (2011). Driver secondary tasks in Germany: Using interviews to estimate prevalence. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43, pp. 1703-1712. DOI: 10.1016 / j.aap.2011.03.029
    44. A. Huemer, M. Vollrath (2012). Ablenkung durch fahrende Tätigkeiten-Machbarkeitsstidie. Berichte der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen, Mensch und Sicherheit M225. Bremerhaven. Wirtschaftsverlag NW.
    45. S.P. Mcevory, M.R. Stevenson, M. Wodwaard. Phone use and crashes while drivers in two Australien states. The Medical Journal of Australia, 185, pp. 630-634.
    46. T. Victor, M. Dozza, J. Bärgman, C.N. Boda, J. Engström, G. Markkula (2014). Analysis of naturalistic driving study data: safer glances. Driver inantention and crash risk.
    47. S.M. Simons, A. Hicks, J.K. Caird. Safety-critical event risk accociated with cell phone tasks as measured in naturalystic driving studies: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 87, pp. 161-169. DOI: 10.1016 / j.aap.2015.11.015
    48. E. Tvesten, M. Dozza (2014). Driving context and visual-manual phone tasks influence glance behavior in naturalistic driving. Transportation Research. Part F: Traffic Physiology and Behavior, vol. 26, pp. 258-272. DOI: 10.1016 / j.trf.2014.08.004
    49. A.T. McCartt, L.A. Hellinga, K.A. Bratiman. Cell phones and driving: review of research // Traffic Injuring Prevention, vol. 7, issue 2, pp. 89-106. DOI: 10.1080 / 15389580600651103
    50. W.J. Horrey, C.D. Wickens (2006). Examing the impact of cell phone conservations on driving using meta-analytic techniques. Human factors, 48 (1), pp. 196-205. DOI: 10.1518 / 001872006776412135
    51. J.R. Sayer, J.M. Deboshire, C.A. (2007). Flanagan Naturalystic driving performance driving secondary tasks. Proceedings of the 4th International Driving Symposium of Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vecicle Design, WA, Stevenson.
    52. P. Green (1998). Visual and task demands of driver information systems. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
    53. M.P. Reed, P.A. Green (1999). Comparison of driving performance on-road and a low-cost simulation using in a low-cost simulation using a concurrent telephone dialing task. Ergonomics, 42 (8), pp. 1015-1037. DOI: 10.1080 / 001401399185117
    54. V. Huth, Y. Sanches, C. Brusque (2015). Drivers phone use at red traffic lights: A roadside observation study comparing calls and visual-manual interactions. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 74, pp. 42-48. DOI: 10.1016 / j.aap.2014.10.008
    55. S. Box (2009). New data from Virgina Tech Transportation Institute provides insight into cell phone use and driving distraction.
    56. I.I. Eliseeva, M.M. Yuzbashev (2006). General theory of statistics. 5th ed. Moscow: Finance and Statistics. 656 p.
    57. L. Tijerina, E. Parmer, M.J. Goodman (1998). Driver workload assessment of route guidance system destination entry while driving. A test track study. Proceedings of the 5th ITS World Congress, pp. 12-16.
    58. K.L. Young, M.A. Regan, J.D. Lee (2009). Measuring the effects of driver distraction: Direct driving performance methods and measures, pp. 85-105.
    59. J. Stutts, J. Feagens, D. Reinfurt, E. Rodgman, C. Hamlett, K. Gish, L. Stapling (2005). Driver’s exposure to distractions in their natural driving environment. Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1093-1101. DOI: 10.1016 / j.aap.2005.06.007

Information about author:

Maria Yu. Karelina, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Machines Parts and the Theory of Mechanisms, Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University (MADI), Moscow, Russia
Pavel I. Pospelov, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Survey and Design of Roads, Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University (MADI), Moscow, Russia
Alexander G. Tatashev, Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Higher Mathematics, Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University (MADI), Moscow, Russia
Alexey V. Terentyev, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Docent, Associate Professor of the Department of Machine Parts and Theory of Mechanisms, Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University (MADI), Russia
Yuri V. Trofimenko, Head of the Department of Technosphere Safety, Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University (MADI), Moscow, Russia
Marina V. Yashina, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Higher Mathematics, Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University (MADI), Moscow, Russia