+7 (495) 957-77-43

T-Comm_Article 2_3_2020

Извините, этот техт доступен только в “Американский Английский”. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.

EQUIPMENT FOR COMPENSATION OF VARIATIONS OF THE EARTH’S MAGNETIC FIELD

Boris V. Hlopov, JSC «CNIRTI named after academician A.I. Berg», Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia, hlopovu@yandex.ru
Grigory I. Andreev, JSC «CNIRTI named after academician A.I. Berg», Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
Nikolai P. Kolesnikov, Deputy General Director, JSC «CNIRTI named after academician A.I. Berg», Moscow, Russia,
Valeria S. Samoylova, JSC Central Research Radio Engineering Institute of the Academician A.I. Berg, Moscow, Russia, samvalser@yandex.ru
Vasily D. Shashurin, MGTU of N.E. Bauman, Moscow, Russia, shashurin@bmstu.ru
Sergey A. Meshkov, MGTU of N.E. Bauman, Moscow, Russia, sb67241@mail.ru

Abstract
The article shows the possibility of detecting anomalies of electromagnetic fields created by industrial and special objects, as well as samples of special equipment hidden on the earth’s surface or underground. It is shown that this problem is solved when creating an on-Board detector equipped with highly sensitive measuring magnetometric means. If an abnormal change in the magnetic field on Earth is detected with variations in the magnetic field or electromagnetic radiation, it is necessary to measure the variations and take into account the variations in the Earth’s magnetic field when obtaining the electrical parameters of the object. The article discusses some domestic and foreign methods of searching and detecting underwater and surface objects using onboard magnetometric tools that allow you to conduct a survey of the designated search area for an underwater or ground object. The information considered in the article from a foreign source confirmed the correctness of the chosen direction of research and development of the process of detecting objects hidden in the area with higher accuracy. Comparative characteristics of magnetic detectors used by foreign armies, which are effectively used in the conditions of counteraction to hydroacoustic means of reconnaissance, as well as ground samples of modern magnetic detectors used by foreign armies, which have a sensitivity of no more than 0.1 nTl, which allows distinguishing samples of military equipment at a distance of up to 50 m. The detector considered in the article, placed on an aircraft, with the ability to measure and compensate for variations in magnetic fields, provides detection of reflected signals from radiation objects, measurement of technical characteristics of signals, registration of the magnetic field on the earth’s surface and in the atmosphere. To avoid interference in the path of propagation of radio waves from the detector transmitter to the radiation object and back, taking into account the variation of The earth’s magnetic field, the detector uses an antenna device with a sharp decrease in the level of the side lobes of the signal spectrum. In the antenna device, the developers placed a solenoid with a magnetic opal matrix made of nano-composite multiferroid material at the bottom of the resonator [5-8]. To control and irradiate the nanocomposite, a solenoid with a flat spiral magnetic field-forming system [1] is proposed, which increases the integral electromagnetic susceptibility while reducing the shielding effects. The obtained experimental dependences of the magnetic susceptibility of nano-composite multiferroid material placed in the detector antenna device confirm the correctness of the decision to detect an object on earth with variations in the magnetic field or electromagnetic radiation, which must be taken into account when obtaining the parameters of the object when the earth’s magnetic field changes, as well as the influence of atmospheric influence, and make the necessary corrections when performing calculations to clarify the object’s location.

Keywords: magnetic detector, magnetometer, magnetic field variations, aircraft, metamaterials, composite material.

References

1. Yarotsky V.A. (1984). Methods for detecting and determining the location of objects by their constant magnetic field. Foreign radio electronics, no. 3, pp. 48.
2. Kondratenkov G.S., Frolov A.Yu. (2005). Radio Vision. Earth remote sensing radar systems. Moscow: Radio Engineering. 367 p.
3. Patent RU2332681C2, priority from 16.10.2006
4. Patent RU2332681C2, priority from 16.10.2006
5. Khlopov B.V. Chucheva G.V., Mityagin, A.B. A Phase change of the multiferroic magnetic materials used in the systems external storage. News of Saratov University. New series. Series: Physics. Vol. 17. No. 1. 2017, pp. 33-43.
6. Yuanzhe Piao. (2016). Multi-Ferroic Polymer Nanoparticle Composites for Next Generation Metamaterials. AOARD. Final Report. April 25th, pp. 13.
7. Samoilovich M.I., Belyanin A.F., Bovtun V., Chucheva G.V., Khlopov B.V. (2016). Features of phase transformations and crystallization of metals and compounds based on them (Ni, Fe) in interspheric cavities of SiO2 nanospheric lattice packages. Collection of scientific papers of the XXI International scientific and technical conference «High technologies in Russian industry», XXVIII International Symposium «Thin films in electronics», VIII International scientific and technical conference «Nanoengineering». September 8-10, Moscow, Russia, pp. 355-360.
8. Khlopov B.V., Shashurin V.D., Chucheva G.V., Samoilova V.S., Mityagina A B. (2017). Investigation of the possibility of multiferroid metamaterials based on opal matrices to change their parameters under the influence of an external electromagnetic field. T-Comm. Vol. 11. No. 10, pp. 38-44.
9. Khlopov B.V., Samoilovich M.I., Mityagin A.Yu. (2013). Investigation of spatial multiplication of a pulsed magnetic field by metamaterial samples. T-Comm. 2013. No. 1, pp. 48-50.
10. Khlopov B.V., Andreev G.A., Samoilova V.S., Shashurin V.D., Meshkov S.A. (2019). Technological equipment for initialization of structured composite materials. T-Comm. Vol. 13. No. 9, pp. 30-33.
11. Samoylovich M.I., Belyanin A.F., Klescheva S.M., Tsvetkov M.Yu. (2010). Features of phase transformations and crystallization in nanocavities of lattice packing of SiO2 nanospheres. Science and technology in industry. No. 4, pp. 73-84.
12. Ustinov V.V., Rinkevich A.B., Perov D.V., Samoilovich M.I., Klescheva S.M. (2012). Anomalous magnetic antiresonance and resonance in ferrite nanoparticles embedded in opal matrix. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. Vol. 324,  pp. 78 82.
13. Nuzhnyy D., Vanek P., Petzelt J., Bovtun V., Kempa M., Gregora I., Savinov M., Krupkova R., Studnicka V., Bursik J., Samoylovich M.I., Schranz W. (2010). Properties of BaTiO3 confined in nanoporous Vycor and artificial opal – opal. Proc. Appl. Ceram. Vol. 4, pp. 215-223.
14. Sarychev A.K., Shalaev V.M. (2007). Electrodynamics of metamaterials. World Scientific and Imperial College Press. 200 p.