Извините, этот техт доступен только в “Американский Английский”. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.
EXPENSE EVALUATION AND OPTIMIZATION FOR PROVIDING COMMUNICATION SYSTEM SUSTAINABILITY
DOI: 10.36724/2072-8735-2020-14-7-57-63
Vladimir I. Filatov, Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, Russia, vfil10@mail.ru
Yevgeny N. Khokhlachev , Military Academy of RVSN named after Peter the Great, Balashikha, Russia, khokhlach@mail.ru
Alexander S. Nekrasov, Military Academy of RVSN named after Peter the Great, Balashikha, Russia, sanya.nekrasov.1992@mail.ru
Nikolay V. Sidorov, Military Academy of RVSN named after Peter the Great, Balashikha, Russia, snv20072007@mail.ru
Abstract
In article discusses the problem of rational distribution of costs among the forces and means ensuring the preservation of the stability of the communication system. In the given task values of probability of reduction of stability of communication system and intensity of its recovery are determined. The article specifies the limitations of the task, as well as the stages of implementation. In the work, the function of costs for ensuring preservation of the required stability and the required intensity of its restoration is justified with determination of values and detection of trends of cost change at change of values of indicators of probability of reduction of stability of the communication system and intensity of its restoration. In the resulting result, the total cost of keeping the object alive is determined by the dependency resulting from the calculations. Areas of permissible values of variables of probability of reduction of stability of communication system and intensity of its recovery are determined. In the given task the algorithm of numerical method is defined, the result of which was formation of areas of permissible values of probability of reduction of stability of communication system and intensity of its restoration. The article described in detail the method of cost minimization, which was to determine the procedure of finding the required values, at which costs are minimized according to the task. Examples of determination of costs for object survival, required minimum values of survival function are given. The figures calculated in the computer program were tabulated. Dependencies were determined from the resulting values in the table. Based on the obtained schedules of cost dependence on survival, the corresponding conclusions were drawn.
Keywords: communication system stability, communication system object persistence, cost dependence, recovery intensity, numerical method algorithm, cost function.
References
-
- Anpilogov V.R. (2015). “Efficiency of low-orbit satellite communication systems on the basis of small spacecrafts,” Technologies and means of communication. No. 4. P. 62-66.
2. Communication systems on the basis of not geostationary satellites of KA range. (2009). Technologies and means of communication. No. 6-2. Special release «Satellite communication and broadcasting – 2010». Under the general editorial office Anpilogov V.R. P. 42-43.
3. Chernov A.A., Chernavsky G.M. (2004). “Orbits of satellites of remote sensing of Earth. Lectures and exercises,” Moscow: Prod. Radio and communication.
4. Cantor L. Ya., Heifetz of V.N. (2001). “Kvazigeostatsionarnaya orbit,” Telecommunication. No. 4.
5. Wind B.B., Gritsenko A.A. Sistema of satellites in elliptic orbits emulating features of the system of satellites on a geostationary earth orbit. Patent of the Russian Federation No. 2223205. Request of 28.03.2002.
6. Wind B.B., Lipatov A.A., Gritsenko A.A., etc. (2001). “Virtual and pseudo-stationary orbits in regional satellite communication systems and broadcastings,” Technologies and means of communication. No. 5.
7. Testoyedov N.A., Vygonsky Yu.G., Kuzovnikov A.V. (2015). “The domestic system of personal mobile satellite communication with spacecrafts on a geostationary and high-elliptic earth orbit,” High technologies. Vol. 16. No. 3.
8. RD 45.041-99. Norms on electric parameters of digital channels and paths of satellite transmission systems. It is approved by the Order of Gostelekom of Russia of September 28, 1999 No. 48.
9. Tsimbal M., Panko S. (2015). Features of the HEO Satellite Communication Systems, International Siberian Conference on Control and Communications.
10. Shalaginov A. (2014). “Projects of multifunction satellite systems for the Arctic regions of Russia,” Technologies and means of communication. No. 6(2). Special release «Satellite communication and broadcasting — 2014». P. 16-17.
11. Lokshin B. (2013). “About one possibility of the organization of mobile communication with VEO in Ku-diapazone,” Technologies and means of communication. No. 6(2). Special release «Satellite communication and broadcasting — 2014». P. 18-20.
12. Anpilogov V. (2013). “About problems of satellite communication and broadcasting in the Arctic,” Technologies and means of communication. No. 6(2). Special release «Satellite communication and broadcasting – 2014». P. 24-31.
- Anpilogov V.R. (2015). “Efficiency of low-orbit satellite communication systems on the basis of small spacecrafts,” Technologies and means of communication. No. 4. P. 62-66.
Information about authors:
Vladimir I. Filatov, candidate of technical Sciences (KTN), associate Professor at the Bauman Moscow State Technical University, faculty of Informatics and control systems, Department of information protection, Moscow, Russia
Yevgeny N. Khokhlachev, doctor of technical Sciences senior research associate of t of he Military Academy of Strategic Rocket Troops after Peter the Great, 8 Karbyshev str., Balashikha, Moscow region, Russia
Alexander S. Nekrasov, educator, research fellow of he Military Academy of Strategic Rocket Troops after Peter the Great, Balashikha, Russia
Nikolay V. Sidorov, candidate of Military Sciences, Associate Professor, Military Academy of RVSN named after Peter the Great, Balashikha, Russia