Извините, этот техт доступен только в “Американский Английский”. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPT OF CREATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF 5G/IMT-2020 NETWORKS IN RUSSIA, CHINA, USA AND EUROPE
Behrooz Daneshmand, ITMO University, St. Petersburg, Russia, daneshmandbehrooz@gmail.com
Abstract
This article raises the question of the prospects for the development of 5G networks in Russia, China, the United States and Europe. Currently, there are four distinct generations of cellular communication in the world and in Russia. The development of each subsequent generation of communication as technical and economic capabilities improved and the spread of dominant standards occurred approximately every 10 years. The research community and industry in general agree that in the future it is impossible to meet future mobile traffic demand and application requirements simply by evolving the current fourth generation architecture. Instead, there is a need for a significant overhaul of the mobile network system: such an effort is commonly referred to as the future fifth generation (5G) architecture, and large-scale initiatives have been launched around the world to address this issue. The research community has already invested a very significant effort in identifying new individual technologies. The fact that all new offerings are labeled 5G has created a lot of confusion about what 5G really is. The purpose of this article is to shed light on the current state of the definition of 5G architecture and trends in the required technologies in Russia, the United States, China and Europe. Key contributions are: (1) analyze the 5G requirements defined by various global initiatives, highlighting the similarities and differences in 5G network development in Russia, China, the United States and Europe; (2) discuss current technology trends showing that there is broad consensus on the key factors driving 5G development in these countries; (3) strive to understand the new concepts that need to be developed with assistive technology to meet the desired requirements.
Keywords: 5G / IMT-2020, SDN, communication network, software-defined network, virtualization, network equipment, technology, 5G projects, 5G spectrum, 5G communication generation, 5G development.
References
1. 5G-PPP. 5G Vision. The 5G Infrastructure Public Private Partnership: The Next Generation of Communication Networks and Services. Http://bit.ly/1GZuqHW Published February 2015.
2. 4G Americas. 4G Americas’ Recommendations on 5G Requirements and Solutions. http://bit.ly/2pCiGvv. Published October 2014.
3. IMT. 5G Vision and Requirements. https://www.itu.int/dms_pubrec/itu- r / rec / m / R-REC-M.2083-0-201509-I !! PDF-E.pdf. Published May 2015.
4. Concept of creation and development of 5G / IMT-2020 networks in the Russian Federation. https://digital.gov.ru/uploaded/files/proekt-kontseptsii-sozdaniya- i-razvitiya-setej-5g-imt-2020-v-rossijskoj-federatsii.pdf.
5. Monserrat JF, Mange G, Braun V, Tullberg H, Zimmermann G, Bulakci. METIS research advances towards the 5G mobile and wireless system definition. EURASIP J Wirel Commun Netw. 2015; 2015 (1). P. 53-68.
6. Osseiran A, Boccardi F, Braun V, et al. Scenarios for 5G mobile and wireless communications: The vision of theMETIS project. IEEE Commun Mag. 2014; 52 (5). P. 26-35.
7. Nokia Networks. Network Architecture for the 5G Era. Http://bit.ly/2qugPsC. Published March 2015.
8. Ziegler V, Theimer T, Sartori C, et al. Architecture vision for the 5G era. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC); May 2016; Kuala Lumpur.
9. Ericsson. 5G Radio Access. http://bit.ly/2qurxzn. Published June 2014.
10. Samsung. 5G Vision. http://bit.ly/2quqvTX. Published February 2015. In the meantime, there is no need to worry about it.
11. Huawei. 5G Network Architecture — A High-Level Perspective. Http://bit.ly/2q4PZ9b. Published July 2016.
12. Rost P, Banchs A, Berberana I, et al. Mobile network architecture evolution toward 5G. IEEE Commun Mag. 2016; 54 (5). P. 84-91.
13. Marsch P, Da Silva I, Bulakci O, et al. 5G radio access network architecture: Design guidelines and key considerations. IEEE Commun Mag. 2016; 54 (11). P. 24- 32.
14. Monserrat JF, Droste H, Bulakci O, et al. Rethinking the mobile and wireless network architecture: TheMETIS research into 5G. 2014 European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC); June 2014; Bologna.
15. Agyapong PK, Iwamura M, Staehle D, Kiess W, Benjebbour A. Design considerations for a 5G network architecture. IEEE Commun Mag. 2014; 52 (11). P. 65-75.
16. NEC. Network Evolution Toward 2020 and Beyond. http://bit.ly/1JCRP4n. Published March 2015.
17. Larsson EG, Edfors O, Tufvesson F, Marzetta TL. MassiveMIMOfor next generationwireless systems. IEEE CommunMag. 2014; 52 (2). P. 186-195.
18. Open Networking Foundation. Software-Defined Networking: The New Norm for Networks. https://www.opennetworking.org. Published April 2012.
19. NFV ISG. Network Functions Virtualization (NFV) -Network Operator Perspectives on Industry Progress. http://bit.ly/1oAZ7yv. Published October 2013.
20. NGMN Alliance. Suggestion on Potential Solutions for C-RAN. Http://bit.ly/2qJnpLN. Published January 2013.
21. Fodor G, Dahlman E, Mildh G, et al. Design aspects of network assisted device-to-device communications. IEEE Commun Mag. 2012; 50 (3). P. 170-177.