+7 (495) 957-77-43
Контакты

T-Comm_Article 7_8_2021

Извините, этот техт доступен только в “Американский Английский”. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.

MODELING DATA TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS USING MODERN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES

Eleonora G. Akhmetshina, Povolzhskiy state university of telecommunications
and informatics, Samara, Russia, elyamalusha@mail.ru

Abstract
When modeling data transmission systems for various purposes, including computer and telecommunication networks, both components of mathematical modeling are widely used. These are simulation modeling and analytical modeling based on queuing theory. At the same time, researchers can always compare the results obtained by means of simulation and analytical modeling. From modern technologies of simulation modeling, one can single out the IT GURU Academic Edition technologies, represented by the Opnet Modeler and Riverbed Modeler software products with powerful graphical editors. Graphic editors allow you to create simulation models of data transmission systems of any complexity, and launch and run their models to obtain statistics of the main performance indicators of these systems. Comparison of the simulation results with the results of queuing systems (QS) of the G/G/1 type makes it possible to assess the adequacy of those and other mathematical models. This article summarizes the results of the author’s publications on G/G/1 systems based on time-shifted distribution laws such as exponential, hyperexponential, and Erlang distribution. Thus, these distribution laws for the random variables used provide the coefficients of variation less than, equal or greater than one. This fact is important from the point of view of the queuing theory, because the average delay of claims in the system directly depends on the coefficients of variations in the time intervals for the arrival and servicing of claims.

Keywords: IT GURU technologies, simulation modeling, analytical modeling, QS with time lag,
average delay.

References

  1. Kleinrock L. (1979). Queuing theory, Moscow, Mashinostroeinie Publ, 432 p.
  2. Brannstrom N.A. (2004). Queueing Theory analysis of wireless radio systems, Appllied to HS-DSCH, Lulea university of technology, 79 p.
  3. Tarasov V.N., Bahareva N.F., Konnov A.L., Ushakov Yu.A. (2008). Proektirovanie i modelirovanie setej EVM v sisteme Opnet Modeler. Laboratornyj praktikum. Samara, 233 p.
  4. Riverbed to Acquire OPNET Technologies, Inc., 2015. — Available at: www.riverbed.com/about/news-articles/press-releases/ riverbed-to-acquire-opnet-technologies-inc.html.
  5. Tarasov V.N. (2018). Extension of the Class of Queueing Systems with Delay, Automation and Remote Control, 79, no. 12, pp. 2147–2157, DOI: 10.1134/S0005117918120056
  6. Tarasov V.N., Bahareva N.F., Ahmetshina E.G. (2018). Analiz novoj sistemy massovogo obsluzhivaniya E2/E2/1 s zapazdyvaniem, Infokommunikacionnye tekhnologii, No.3. P. 277-282.
  7. Tarasov V.N., Akhmetshina E.G. (2018). The average waiting time in a queuing system H2/H2/1 with delay, Samar. Gos. Tekhn. Univ., Ser. Fiz.-Mat. Nauki, No. 4. P. 702–713.
  8. Tarasov V.N., Bahareva N.F., Ahmetshina E.G. (2018). Sistema massovogo obsluzhivaniya E2/M/1 s obychnymi i sdvinutymi vhodnymi raspredeleniyami, Infokommunikacionnye tekhnologii, No. 4. P. 387-392.
  9. Tarasov V.N., Bahareva N.F., Ahmetshina E.G. (2020). Issledovanie dvuh sistem massovogo obsluzhivaniya M/E2/1 s obychnymi i so sdvinutymi vhodnymi raspredeleniyami, Infokommunikacionnye tekhnologii, No.1. P. 33-38.
  10. Tarasov V.N., Bahareva N.F., Ahmetshina E.G. (2020). Modeli teletrafika na osnove dvojstvennyh sistem s zapazdyvaniem s gipereksponencial’nymi i eksponencial’nymi raspredeleniyami, Informacionnye tekhnologii, No. 4. P. 195-202.
  11. Whitt W. (1982). Approximating a point process by a renewal process: two basic methods, Operation Research, vol. 30, no.1. P. 125-147.
  12. Aliev T.I. (2013). Approksimaciya veroyatnostnyh raspredelenij v modelyah massovogo obsluzhivaniya, Nauchno-tekhnicheskij vestnik informacionnyh tekhnologij, mekhaniki i optiki, 84. No. 2. P. 88-93.
  13. Bocharov P.P., Pechinkin A.V. (1995). Teoriya massovogo obsluzhivaniya, Moscow, Publishing House of Peoples’ Friendship University, 529 p.
  14. Novitzky S., Pender J., Rand R.H. (2019). Wesson E. Nonlinear Dynamics in Queueing Theory: Determining the Size of Oscillations in Queues with Delay, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., 18-1 2019, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 279-311, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/18M1170637
  15. Adan I., D’Auria B., Kella O. (2019). Special volume on ‘Recent Developments in Queueing Theory’ of the third ECQT conference, Queueing Systems, 2019, pp. 1-190, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11134-019-09630-1.
  16. Legros B. (2018). M/G/1 queue with event-dependent arrival rates, Queueing Systems, 89, no. 3, pp. 269-301, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007 /s11134-017-9557-7.
  17. Bazhba M., Blanchet J., Rhee CH. et al. (2019). Queue with heavy-tailed Weibull service times, Queueing Systems, vol. 93, no. 11, pp. 1-32, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11134-019-09640-z

Information about author:

Eleonora G. Akhmetshina, graduate student, Software department, Povolzhskiy state university of telecommunications and informatics, Samara Russia