CRITERIA FOR MULTI-CRITERIA SELECTION OF A TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK CONFIGURATION FOR A CONTINUOUS MONITORING SYSTEM WITH MOBILE SURVEILLANCE DEVICES
Aleksandr V. Timoshenko, Military University of Radio Electronics, Cherepovets, Russia, u567ku78@gmail.com
Pavel G. Milovanov, Yaroslavl Higher Military School of Air Defense, Yaroslavl, Russia, mpg08@rambler.ru
Azret A. Kochkarov, JSC “RTI named after Academician A. L. Mints”, Moscow, Russia, akochkar@gmail.com
Elena F. Lyadova, Joint-Stock Company “SPC “High Technologies and Strategic Systems”, Moscow, Russia, lenalyadova@yandex.ru
Abstract
The article proposes criteria for multi-criteria selection of the configuration of the telecommunications network of a structural-dynamic continuous monitoring system. The mobility of the components of the monitoring system leads to periodic (or permanent) changes in the topology of the telecommunications network, through which data is transmitted in the monitoring system. Destabilizing effects of both natural and artificial origin also lead to forced changes in the topology of the telecommunications network. To select the configuration of the telecommunications network (a set of information sources, information consumers, data transmission network, and optimally formed information channels) both during the initial construction of the system and during the operation of the system of continuous monitoring for the detection of objects (on a given territory at a given time with a given probability), it is proposed to apply three criteria. The first criterion is the time of configuration formation, the second is the radius of resistance to destabilizing influences, and the third is an indicator of the continuity of information interaction between the elements of the system.
Keywords: disembodied small and medium-class aircraft; aeromobile communication network, information support; information delivery, reconfiguration criteria, telecommunications network, continuous monitoring system.
References
1. Chertova O.G., Chirov D.S. (2019). Building a reference communication network based on small-sized unmanned aerial vehicles with no ground infrastructure. High-tech technologies in space research of the Earth. Vol. 11. No. 3. P. 60-71.
2. Ananiev A.V., Petrenko S.P., Filatov S.V. (2019). Assessment of ways to organize the management of formations of unmanned aerial vehicles in the provision of combat operations of manned aviation. Military thought. No. 1. P. 74-82.
3. Donchenko A.A., Chirov D.S. (2014). Justification of requirements for the communication system of unmanned aerial vehicles of medium and long range. T-Comm. Vol. 8. No.10. P. 88-92.
4. Chirov D.S., Tereshonok M.V., Elsukov B.A. (2015). Method and algorithms for optimizing the technical characteristics of radio monitoring systems. T-Comm. Vol. 9. No. 12. P. 12-16.
5. Kochkarov A.A., Timoshenko A.V., Litvinov A.V., Liadova E.F., Gaichuk Y.N. (2019). Evaluation of the continuity of information interaction and information delivery in monitoring systems with a dynamic structure. Electromagnetic Waves and electronic systems. Vol. 24, No. 8. P. 66-71.
6. Pavlov A.N. (2013). Complex modeling of structural and functional reconfiguration of complex objects. Trudy SPIIRAN. No. 5. P. 143-168.
7. Harary F., Gupta G. (1997). Dynamic Graph Models. Mathl. Comput. Modelling. Vol. 25, No. 7. P. 79-87.
8. Kochkarov A.A., Kochkarov R.A., Malinetskii G.G. (2015). Issues of dynamic graph theory. Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics. Vol. 55. No. 9. P. 1590-1596.
9. Kochkarov A.A., Rakhmanov A.A., Timoshenko A.V., Putyato S.A. (2020). Structural and spatial model of the distribution of special-purpose monitoring system assets by observation objects. Air and space forces. Theory and practice. No. 13. P. 124-132.
10. Makarenko S.I. (2017). Information warfare and radio-electronic warfare in network-centric wars of the beginning of the XXI century. Monograph. St. Petersburg: Science-intensive technologies. 546 ð.
11. Emelichev V.A., Berdysheva R.A. (1998). On the stability radius of the lexicographic optimum vector trajectory problem. Bulletin of the Belarusian University. Series 1. No. 1. P. 43-46.
Information about authors:
Aleksandr V. Timoshenko, Ph.D. (Eng), professor, Military University of Radio Electronics, Cherepovets, Russia
Pavel G. Milovanov, Ph.D. (Eng), docent, Yaroslavl Higher Military School of Air Defense, Yaroslavl, Ruusia
Azret A. Kochkarov, Ph.D. (Math), JSC “RTI named after Academician A. L. Mints”, Moscow, Russia
Elena F. Lyadova, Joint-Stock Company “SPC “High Technologies and Strategic Systems”, Moscow, Russia